| Author: | | New Member Registered: July, 2013 Posts: 2 | | Review Date: February 8, 2024 | Recommended | Price: $75.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | All metal, built-in hood, tripod collar, relatively fast f/4 | | Cons: | Screw mount, very long minimum focus distance | | Sharpness: 9
Handling: 7
Value: 10
Camera Used: K-50
| |
I'd seen some astro shots made with this lens, wanted to do the same, and when I found a good copy on eBay, I offered the seller $100 and he accepted. He shipped me a 400mm SMC f/5.6 Takumar by mistake and refunded $25 for the inconvenience of shipping it back and waiting for the SMC 300mm. After all that, I finally got around to mounting this relic on my K-50 and doing some comparison shots on a distant mountain top radio tower, the challenger being my DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED WR. I expected the modern zoom to outperform the vintage Takumar, but with both lenses set at f/8 the older lens provided marginally better resolution. Wow. $75 well spent. Just the build quality of these early 70's Takumars justifies owning one or two, whether they get used or not.
As a general use lens, the Takumar leaves a lot to be desired - screw mounts are a pain to change, the focusing is slow (but very smooth), and the minimum focus distance is a ridiculous 5.5m or 18ft. None of that matters, as this lens will spend the near entirety of its time on a Skywatcher mount taking long exposure astro shots wide open. For that, it has few rivals in my camera bag, regardless of vintage.
| | | | | | | New Member Registered: August, 2019 Location: Hamburg Posts: 24 | | Review Date: August 30, 2020 | Recommended | Price: $200.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Sharp, Takumar build-quality, | | Cons: | Lots of CA at f4 but improves as you stop down | | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: Sony A7
| |
It's definitely wortth more than what I paid for it.
Like all vintage lenses, you need to know its strengths and weaknesses. One needs to work around it.
The lens is very well made (very typical of Takumar lenses). I have the SMC version in brand new condition. I committed to using only one lens last time I visited the local zoo. It rewarded me with very nice images. The CA is bad wide-open but it is nothing you can't fix in post (especially when there's no purple in the image other than the CA itself).
Sharpness:
I was surprised by how sharp it is especially for such an old lens. It is not "modern" sharp but it is very sharp for a vintage lens. 10/10
Aberrations
Bad aberrations at f4 but it improves as soon as you stop down to f5.6. I'm not too bothered. All good images are worth editing in post. 7/10
Bokeh
Nice bokeh. I don't mind the bokeh even when stopped down. It is not distracting. I give it a 9/10 because of the low number of aperture blades.
Handling
Great! I find that the long focus throw helped me nail the focus. Not good for fast moving subjects but at 300mm, it helps nail the focus. 9/10
Value
Seriously?! At this price?? It's a 10/10
 | | | | | Junior Member Registered: July, 2017 Posts: 42
4 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: May 13, 2020 | Recommended | Price: $100.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | Inexpensive, sharp | | Cons: | Lots of CA | |
I have been using this lens strictly for astrophotography. With the low (used) price range the lens typical sells for today, it is a very good value. Of course, there is quite a bit of CA but much of that is correctable in software; lateral CA completely and longitudinal CA partially. Here are a couple of astrophotos I took using it (tracking by Astrotracer):
 | | | | | New Member Registered: November, 2013 Posts: 14 | | Review Date: August 3, 2019 | Not Recommended | Price: $300.00
| Rating: 2 |
| Pros: | sharp | | Cons: | extreme CA's | | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 1
Bokeh: 7
Handling: 7
Value: 4
Camera Used: spotmatic, K-5. K-S1, k-x fuji x-e1, x-T100
| |
This lens is sharp,
but
- - extreme CA's  , which are not disappearing, when stopped down - terrible !!!
So I sold it, because photos were not acceptable for me.
It is a really a poor lens !!! Succeeding 4/300 of PENTAX lensens are much more better corrected - especially the new AF version.
My worst lens of PENTAX, unfortunately. In contrast: the TAKUMAR 2.5/135 is so nice and well corrected 
================================================================
I've bought a similar SUPER ALBINAR 4/300, because of the high quality of my SUPER ALBINAR 2.8/135 (Sonnar copy) - both lenses with simple 5/5 and 4/4 construction seem to have at least one fluorite element therein, because they are much more better corrected (only very few CAs) and are extremely sharp at f8 - and these lenses are bagain. I can get high resolution with my Fuji x-T100 (24 MP) approx 75 LP/mm = 150 lack and white lines per mm with them - nearly professional values !!!  | | | | | | | Forum Member Registered: March, 2018 Posts: 92
4 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: January 7, 2019 | Recommended | Price: $58.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | Much sharper than I thought it would be | | Cons: | NONE | | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: Pentax K-5
| |
This review is for the Earlier Super Takumar version. Product code 43891
WOW
Outstanding Lens. There is 180 degrees of easy movement on the focus throw with smooth and easy movement of the aperture ring. The built in hood is wonderful at the end of the barrel and comes in handy as you can get a bit of flare with this lens.. The lens is built to last the nuclear winter. Big, maybe bulky to some but this is one of the reasons the Takumar lens can last 50 years and still be in perfect working condition.
As to the quality of the image. With some other long distance lenses there can be some CA around the edges but it is far less than I thought it would be with this lens. With todays post processing application this can be eliminated. While I find the lens sharp it is not that unrealistic not a soft spot on the image kind of sharp. The human eye does not see as sharp as some modern digital devices can produce. What I feel Takumar did with this lens was create a sharpness that matched the human vision.
Colors pop especially if they are contrasting. Colors seem to glow with this glass which can make for a wonderful shot. Being a 300mm it really does a nice job of ring the hosts closer. I often pull over to infinity focus because I am thinking about how far away th object is only to have to back the focus down. It will turn a bit past infinity which is anything over 300 feet. Less than three hundred feet and you will find yourself backing off the focus to get it clearer. I think maybe I'm just a bad judge pf distance.
I found a thrift shop selling this lens on EBAY. I got it for 58 dollars. It came with a super clean original hard case and both rear and front caps. Super clean and really nice to work with.
| | | | | New Member Registered: June, 2015 Location: Bern Posts: 1
2 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: October 5, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $110.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | Build quality, Luminosity, Price | | Cons: | CA (with current software .. no problem) | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 5
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 9
Camera Used: Canon 5D Mk1 (13MP)
| |
Picture sample: 2500 x 1600 Pixel (Windows: right click for higher resolution)
 | | | | | Senior Member Registered: March, 2011 Location: Prince Edward Island Posts: 194
1 user found this helpful
| | Review Date: March 17, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $100.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Cost, Construction, Sharpness, tripod collar, F4 | | Cons: | Manual , M42, | |
Bought this off a forum member. SMC Super TAK 300 F4. Can't afford a new 300mm prime so......
Pros - $$$, did I mention $$$. Full Metal Construction, Very Sharp, Built in Hood, Leather Case,
Cons - Fully Manual
I agree with much of what has been said about this lens already. With modern software though the purple fringing issues are almost irrelevant. If you take your time with this lens then you will get very good results.
This is a really nice looking and feeling lens. It forces you to slow down a little and thus think about what you are doing. This is a plus in my books. It looks awesome mounted on my K20D. There is no way I could justify spending $$$$$$$$$$$ on a new type version of this lens for my shooting needs. If you are on a budget and you don't mind manual mode or Av priority- you can't go wrong with this lens.
Picture Update:
Taken with the K20D, through my patio door to a feeder about 20' away. MINIMAL PP...no crop
 | | | | | Loyal Site Supportaxian Registered: September, 2013 Location: Texas Posts: 503
5 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: December 14, 2013 | Recommended | Price: $100.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | Very sharp. Not too heavy considering vintage 4/300 | | Cons: | High CA and SA | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 4
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 7
Value: 7
Camera Used: Crop Sensor Digital
| |
(Updated Oct 2014)
This is for the last S-M-C version.
Example Gallery that shows good and bad attributes, including some good examples of what looks like lack of sharpness that is really a case of DOF being too shallow for the given subject.
http://jbmedia.zenfolio.com/s-m-c_takumar_4_300
First the bad: Expect to see magenta and green in high contrast situations below F8.
Good: In the digital realm, with post processing this is a very sharp and fast lens given the price. It has only fair balance using on a tripod with the built in foot (but much better if you mount using a longer plate under the foot) and the foot can be conveniently rotated about the lens to quickly allow portrait/landscape orientation. The built in lens hood is very nice. It has the typical luxurious mechanical refinement and although focus is tedious due to the 270'ish degree rotation, it also makes it quite easy to achieve critical focus. The mechanical feel is absolutely fantastic and very satisfying. It's also slightly lighter and shorter than the K 300/4.
Overall: if you're on a budget and your subject is not moving quickly to follow focus...and you're willing to Post-Process the aberrations, this is a fine choice. If you have a bigger budget, there are better lenses.
Side note: Because this lens has a rectangular light baffle at the rear, if you're using an M42 adapter and it's not precisely machined, the baffle will be out of alignment with the film/sensor orientation. If you see any odd vignetting, check for this first.
| | | | | Site Supporter Registered: November, 2010 Location: California Posts: 2,223
3 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: March 5, 2011 | Recommended | Price: $285.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | Great IQ, sharp, easy to use, great color and all what they said above | | Cons: | A bit heavy, but not as much as my 300mm f2.8, so I use it more often | |
I bought this lens after reading a lot of reviews, it is the Super-Takumar 300mm f4 M42 screw lens, apparently this is the one that comes one coating, but it may have been an SMC without being disclosed by Pentax due to experimentation. THe lens is a beauty, built like a tank, I have no problem shooting birds if I pre-focus. The tripod collar is a must and it works perfectly. It came with the original leather case. The retractable hood is a beauty and protects from sun hitting inside (being a fast lens, you know!). I just put it on my Kx and started shooting and all came great.
-----------------
THe shooting with this lens is interesting. You have to put the toggle button MANUAL and move the aperture ring to the desired aperture (e.g., f5.6). You can shoot in AV priority. No need to stop down or green button. So simple!! It seems complicated, but it is actually easier than the stopping down with the green button. It is very fast, and nice to use. I will be posting pics soon. I only gave 9 because it is M42 (screw lens) and gave me a hard time initially with the $8 adapter I bought on Ebay (no focus to infinite). You have to use the authentic Pentax adapter to M42 to be able to focus to infinite and avoid getting the adapter stuck in the camera.
CAUTION: Beware that if you use a non-authentic Pentax adapter, the adapter(or lens) will get stuck in the camera. Even with the adapter recommended by this forum (sold by B&H, made by Bower) you get in trouble. The adapter from B&H cost about $28 and comes with a key to unscrew the adapter from the camera. This is no good. YOU HAVE TO HAVE A REAL GENUINE PENTAX ADAPTER. Since I got the authentic Pentax adapter, I attach and remove the lens to the camera without any problem. I am selling the adapter I bought form B&H and five I got from Ebay. One penny each. I paid $65 for the authentic Pentax adapter.
===================
Update:
This adapter is the best thing since sliced bread. There are some cheap Chinese copies that can work, but no infinite. The Bower is well done and works fine. I had many problems trying to use M42 lenses and the adapters because I did not have instructions. However, when I bought the genuine Pentax / M42 adapter, it came with instructions and it works MARVELOUSLY. The truth is that I was then able to use my Bower adapter and found that it also works just fine. The main mistake: I WAS ATTACHING THE ADAPTER TO THE LENS, AND THAT IS WRONG. THE ADAPTER HAS TO BE ATTACHED TO THE CAMERA, then the lens is screwed in and voila'. To remove the genuine adapter, REMOVE THE LENS FIRST, THEN you pinch the spring with a ballpoint pen and rotate and done. The Bower brings a tool to losen the spring and rotate at the same time, so it is indeed easier to use THAN THE ORIGINAL PENTAX. Go and enjoy the M42 legacy lens. Here is a transcript of the instructions to install and remove the adapter:
1) Fit the adapter, matching the red dot of the adapter with the red dot of the body mount.
2) Turn the adapter clockwise until it stops (65 degrees) by using a ball-point pen or the like to lock it. Then screw-mount lenses can be used.
3) TO remove the adapter, push the spring with a ball-point pen and turn the adapter counter-clockwise until it stops.
SuperTak300mmf4-rosa1 by Palenquero, on Flickr
SuperTak300mmf4-Uni3 by Palenquero, on Flickr
Update: I have ranked this lens 10, since I now I do really enjoy shooting it. Here are other pics:
Dragonfly by Palenquero, on Flickr
(Non working links removed)
Dragonfly by Palenquero, on Flickr
| | | | | Junior Member Registered: August, 2009 Location: Lexington, KY Posts: 30
5 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: December 11, 2009 | Recommended | Price: $185.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | Solid, fast, 300mm with good IQ, tripod mount | | Cons: | Awkward to hold & focus, poor close focus, CA & bokeh CA | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 6
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 7
Value: 8
Camera Used: Sony A350, NEX-7, A7II
| |
Update: as of May 2015, I've been trying to use this on my A7II 24MP FF body. It's very good -- quite sharp from wide open, but with a nice, soft, bokeh. The catch is that the CA is still quite bad -- including bokeh CA. Add the lack of close focus to that makes this a hard lens to love, although it does balance better on my A7II than on my other bodies. The rest of my review remains as it was....
This is for a nice S-M-C copy, complete with tripod mount, used on a 14MP APS-C body.
First impressions are that this is a very serious lens; f/4 is pretty fast for a 300mm, and this is a correspondingly big and heavy piece of glass. Build quality is up to the usual Takumar standards, except perhaps in that the sliding hood can slide a little crooked on mine. The lens tripod mount is nice and absolutely necessary. Even moreso than my cheap (and relatively light) 400mm f/6.3 lenses, this is a lens you attach a camera to, not the reverse.
Unfortunately, this lens is not a pleasure to use handheld, but not directly because of the weight. Focus infinity to near takes a lot of turning the focus collar, yet near isn't very near at all. Handheld, I find myself supporting the lens by cradling the tripod mount in my left hand while my right holds the camera body... which leaves me tweaking focus by "walking" my fingers along the focus collar, which isn't fast. I expected to support the lens by my grip on the focus collar, but that seems to be putting a disturbing level of torque on the lens mount. Like I said, that tripod mount is necessary -- even if you are not using a tripod, it's what you want supporting the lens (and thus also the camera). Fortunately, the tripod mount has a big enough base to brace against any flat-ish object, and it can lock in any rotational position so you can use it to brace against things that are not even close to horizontal.
The sharpness and color are both pretty good, and IQ overall is more than competitive with my Minolta 75-300 zoom wide open (which is f/5.6 vs. f/4 for this lens). Bokeh are about what you'd expect for an f/4 300mm. However, CA on this lens is as bad as the other reviewers say. It also seems to have that unfortunate S-M-C Takumar tendency that when it flares, it often completely floods the image. Frankly, the CA and flare issues are really disappointing, and more what you'd expect in a lens rated 6/10. What brings it up to an 8/10 is the fact that colors don't look anywhere near as flat as they do with most 300mm+ lenses. Incidentally, stopping down even just one click (f/5.6?) helps IQ in every way; there, IQ looks more like a solid 9+/10.
Here's a simple example of how nice and crisp this lens can be. This wasn't the most colorful scene, but colors with this lens are very accurate, well saturated, and generally quite typical of high-end Takumar lenses:
And here's a full resolution crop showing how bad the CA can be:
Ah, but there is good news.... Here's the same thing with the CA fixed by using free editing software to enlarge the Red channel by a few pixels (GIMP's Chromatic Aberration tool with a simple Lateral Red shift of +3.3):
That was really easy; significantly easier than it is for many lenses because the CA pattern here seems to perfectly match the standard correction model. The fact that the fix is so easy and effective almost makes me change the rating to 9, because the corrected image is easily of that IQ. This is true even if the correction is done on a JPEG rather than raw, as this example was corrected as a JPEG.
| | | | | Loyal Site Supporter Registered: January, 2008 Location: Paris, TN Posts: 3,349
2 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: March 14, 2009 | Recommended | Price: $135.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | Build quality and classic Takumar imagery | | Cons: | Heavy, 77mm filter ring | |
The reason for this review is to note that there is also a Super Takumar version that has the same build configuration as the Super Multi-Coated version; e.g., rear aperture ring configuration. (SN range around 4395xxx.) Seems to be identical to the SMC version otherwise.
I'm in agreement with everything stated above regarding the SMC version. Flare, blossoming and PF are noticeable in strong highlights below F8 but commensurate with this type of lens. Contrast degrades noticeably when flare or highlights are present.
Like all of the old Takumars, this lens is a pleasure to use and provides very good to excellent image quality when used with due consideration for lighting conditions.
H2
| | | | | Forum Member Registered: June, 2007 Location: quebec Posts: 75
1 user found this helpful
| | Review Date: February 19, 2009 | Recommended | Price: $270.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | verry sharp, nice color, and contrast, built in hood. | | Cons: | lot of PF wide open, hard to focus, slow to work with. | |
The verry thin deep of field and the stiff foccussing ring make this lens slow and hard to use.
Capable of producing outstanding picture.
PF is almost gone by f4.5
With a little post processing f4 look as sharp as f8 shots.
A fun lens for lazying around.
| | | | | Senior Member Registered: September, 2008 Location: Norway Posts: 127
1 user found this helpful
| | Review Date: September 17, 2008 | Recommended | Price: $270.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | quite sharp, nice bokeh, fantastic build quality | | Cons: | a bit soft wide open | |
Now this is a cool lens! I bought it from an online auction for almost $270, it's the latest SMC model. Seems to be a bit higher price than most of the others here paid for it, but it is in absolute mint condition.
It was my first "super tele", and I really like this one. It's not quite as sharp as the later *-models, but able to produce quite impressive images, especially if stopped down a bit. Even though it does not have a gazillion number of diaphragm blades it creates a nice smooth bokeh. I also love the styling of this lens. It's oh so cool and 70s.
On the downside it could have had a tripod mount, although it is quite nice to do handheld shooting with. As someone pointed out earlier in this thread it can sometimes feel like it takes forever to focus, but you'll have very precise control of it. The minimum focus distance can be a bit annoying.
All in all a good performer. A cool thing to put on you K20 if you want people to stare at you Even if I do cash out for a DA* 300, I don't think I would sell this one. It's just such a nice thing to have and to prove the wonderful craftsmanship that went into building lenses like this some 30 years ago.
| | | | | Senior Member Registered: December, 2007 Location: Kansas, USA Posts: 123
1 user found this helpful
| | Review Date: February 26, 2008 | Recommended | Price: $143.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | SHARP, COLORS, extremely sharp even at f/4, tripod mount, built-in lens hood, fast | | Cons: | struggles with CA at wide apertures, somewhat heavy, min focus distance 18 ft | |
I love this lens, I will be using it with a Bower 2x teleconverter soon enough! I currently use it as my go-to telephoto lens. It is tack sharp at any aperture, and although I haven't done any exact tests, I'm sure it's extraordinary at f/8. And wow, colors are incredible!
The only reason it's not a 10? Chromatic aberrations and minimum focus distance. At f/4, CA and PF shows in 90% of situations. In very contrasty situations, even stopping down to f/22 doesn't eliminate the CA. Usually stopping down to f/8 will eliminate most of it though. Also, don't even think about going macro, unless you have extension tubes. Minimum focus distance 18 feet...
The verdict:
Go for it, but test it out before you buy it. If bad CA or 18-foot minimum focus distance bothers you, then this lens is not for you. If you want a tack sharp fast 300mm lens for wildlife or other purposes, go for it!
| | | | | Senior Member Registered: March, 2007 Location: Slovenia Posts: 140
1 user found this helpful
| | Review Date: February 17, 2008 | Recommended | Price: $180.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Excellent build quality, easily handholdable, very good resolution | | Cons: | Noticable cromatic aberation on wide open aperture (f/4) | | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 9
| |
An excellent choice for wildlife photography. Very good resolution, relatively lightweight, easily handholdable. Retractable "built-in" metal lens hood is an absolute benefit as is a removable and adjustable tripod mount leg.
However, focusing does take some time, since You have to turn the focusing ring nearly 270 deg. from inf. to the closest possible focusing distance of 5.5 meters, but this is a minor issue, and easily solved with pre-focusing technique. Originally comes in a very nice hard, leather padded lens-case.
Recommended!
| | |
;)
;)
;)
