All About Photographic Lenses.
Specifications, comparison, reviews, MTF-charts for lenses by Canon, Nikon, Sony, Pentax, Olympus, Sigma, Tamron, Carl Zeiss, etc.

Imado 135 mm f/ 2.8 MC Lens

Do you like a good instrumental music?
Listen to new beautiful music from composer Sergei Borodin. Click HERE...


Imado 135 mm f/ 2.8 MC lens

Imado 135 mm f/ 2.8 MC lens

Imado 135 mm f/ 2.8 MC lens

Format: 35mm SLR

Type: Prime lens

Focusing: Manual Focus (MF)

Lens mounts: Nikon F (FX, DX), Nikon F (FX, DX)

User reviews (1)

Photos (0)

Tests (0)

Owners (1)

Views (4795)

Average price: $30


Focal lengthMax. apertureMin. apertureBladesMin. Focus (m.)Filter Ø (mm.)Weight (gr/oz)Length (mm/in)
135mmf/2.8f/2261.555 75/3

Additional information:

The Imado 135mm f/2.8 MC is a prime lens with AI Nikon F mount and fully manual focus. Intended for portraiture, but also useful for general telephotography.

The aperture ring features several steps of 0.5 f-stops each, with marks each 1 f-stop, covering from f/2.8 to f/22.

This model does not include any retractable hood, but it is possibly to use one as accessory on the filter thread (55mm.). The focusing is very soft, covering approx. 45% of a full turn to focus objects from 1.5m to infinity.

Posted by: Carlos Diaz   Date of publication: 18.02.2015

Mechanical quality4.002
Optical quality2.502
Pricing / Value5.002
Overall lens rating

Embed to Blog (HTML) Embed to Forum (BBcode)

Owner reviews: Imado 135 mm f/ 2.8 MC

Fernando Schmidt 12.09.2020 00:52:44
Period of use: 2 years

If you ask about how sharp it is, then is sharp to very sharp f4 and upper.
It is nice for lanscape at f8/f11... Not if you use bokeh as dominant part of your composition nearly wide open.
If you try to do portraits whit this lens, i sugest use a very soft background, this lens have very nervous bokeh. Sometimes (few times) you get a nice portrait after f4
It is a very ligthweigth and small lens.
Very cheap, I bought it just for 4 dollars at that time.


Well, the main reason to buy 135mm lens is to take portraits:
In this category, this lens is horrible.
Soft wide open.
The Bokeh is "so so" wide open, but at f4 and upper is horrible to my taste. 
The caracter of this lens is not useful at all.
I remember cooler color, not ideal for skin tones.
To be a old an all metal lens, it is not on par with 3dr party lenses like Hoya, Vivitar, just to name few.


This pictures were taken with Nikon D300 many years ago (2011).
I did some test the first time with this lens (Girl/Color), as you can see...the bokeh looks horrible.
The Nikkor AF-d 80-200 f2.8 pull MK2 did a much better job :P
As you can see, the B&W photo looks "great" and the character of the lens is not a problem with this kind of Subject/pictures.
After several use, the barrel get stuck, the grese of helicoid were dry (probably common whit old lenses), the helicoid is made of aluminum, I trayed two time to put in place after lub, but thread get in bad shape and died.
This lens is easy to disassamble, but is quite sensible to damage. 
Worth it?
Well, depend on you. This cost me almost free, so... yes, it is fun to try old lenses.
Then, if you want a fine and nice optics and you don´t wanna lose time, this is not for you.
If you want a great optics, look at Nikkors Ai/Ais, 135mm f2.8 or even better and legendary 105mm f2.5 ;)
Is a 2 points optic of 5 posible points
Mechanical quality 3.00 Average
 Optical quality 2.00 Poor
 Usability 2.00 Poor
 Pricing / Value 5.00 Excellent
 Bokeh 1.00 Very Poor
Overall lens rating