Canon FD 28 mm f/ 2.8 Lens

Do you like a good instrumental music?
Listen to new beautiful music from composer Sergei Borodin. Click HERE...

Pictures

Format: 35mm SLR

Type: Prime lens

Focusing: Manual Focus (MF)

Lens mounts: Canon FD, FDn, Canon FD, FDn

First year of production: 1975

Optical design: 7 elements in 7 groups

User reviews (1)

Photos (2)

Tests (0)

Owners (15)

Views (11868)

Average price: $65

Specifications:

Focal length	Max. aperture	Min. aperture	Blades	Min. Focus (m.)	Filter Ø (mm.)	Weight (gr/oz)	Length (mm/in)
28mm	f/2.8	f/22	5	0.3	55	230/8,1	47.2/1,9

Additional information:

The Canon FD 28 mm f/ 2.8 is a wide-angle lens for Canon FD SLR cameras.

It is incompatible with the modern Canon EF bayonet mount because of its construction and flange focal distance.

There were two versions of the lens. The specifications of the second version (as of 1977) are given bellow.

The first variant of the Canon FD 28 mm f/ 2.8 (1975-1977) was notable for its slight changes in the frame construction, greater weight (280 g) and length (49 mm).

Posted by: photocorner Date of publication: 08.02.2011

Start a discussion about this lens on our forum

Photos taken with this lens Canon FD 28 mm f/ 2.8:

All photos

Scared Father
Autor: Cezary

4.67

1472

Nuclear Power Plant
Autor: Cezary

4.33

904

Mechanical quality	4.00	5
Optical quality	4.40	5
Usability	3.80	5
Pricing / Value	4.20	5
Bokeh	3.00	5
Overall lens rating	3.88

Report an error or add info

Add a photo taken with this lens

Add PDF file to this lens profile

Add this lens to comparison list

Sell this lens on the Marketplace

Owner reviews: Canon FD 28 mm f/ 2.8

ProfHankD 04.01.2016 21:09:18

Period of use: 60 months

Strengths:

Typical FDn: good contrast, small and light, and overall decent IQ (I'd give it a "B").

Weaknesses:

Typical Canon propensity to flare badly. Very plastic build that of good quality, but lacks the nice tactile properties of most of the competing lenses. Flimsy FDn metal stamping in the lens mount, but that's ok for a lens this short and light.

Comments:

I'm reviewing the FDn version. Nothing wrong with it, but nothing compelling about it either.

Comments (1)