All About Photographic Lenses.
Specifications, comparison, reviews, MTF-charts for lenses by Canon, Nikon, Sony, Pentax, Olympus, Sigma, Tamron, Carl Zeiss, etc.

Lens User Reviews (431)

Here you can view lens reviews written by their owners. To add your own review please login and select your lens in the lens database.

Lens mount

Brand

Format

Prime/zoom

Focusing

Focal length
from to
Max. aperture
from to
Price ($)
from to

advanced search
Ultra-Sonic Motor
Macro lens
Fisheye lens
Mirror lens
Shift lens
Tilt lens
Soft lens
Optical stabilisation
Defocus control
Paging: [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] ... [ 20 ] [ 21 ] [ 22 ]

NerveNet 08.01.2025 22:41:30
User review for lens: Nikon AF Nikkor 28 mm f/ 2.8 (II)

Period of use: 7 months

Strengths:

Low price, small, lightweight, autofocus and electronic aperture control.


Weaknesses:

Poor build quality, metal mount but the rest is made of plastic.

Loose focusing ring and small focus throw, difficult to use in manual.

Too few DOF marks.

Poor border image quality at all apertures. Barrel distortion.


Comments:

It is a small and very cheap made prime lens by Nikon, it has autofocus and electronic aperture control, but has nothing to do with previous Nikon Ai-S lenses.

The Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 Ai-S I own outperforms this lens in any regard, except aufocus and electronic aperture control of course.

Modern Nikon DSLR have no correction profiles for this lens. Nikon software also do not includes the correction profile for this lens. Use Darktable instead.

If you want to use this lens manually, forget it, the focusing ring is loose and has a short focus throw that makes it difficult to use. I you like to use zone focusing techniques you will not like this lens too, the value prior to inifinty is 2 meters and it has few DOF marks, less marks than the Ai-S cousin.

In order to get the best results start closing the aperture to f/8, if you need something better go for the Nikon Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 Ai-S o Ai instead.

 

But not everything is negative, it is a cheap autofocus prime lens, that is the point.

 

Other cheap option is the Tamron 28mm f/2.5 Adaptall-2 bundled with an Adaptall-2 to Nikon F Ai-S adapter. The Tamron has smoother focusing ring, better build and smaller. Optically the Tamron is a bit better.




buslig22 05.01.2025 15:13:51
User review for lens: Fujinon XF 16 mm f/ 1.4 R WR

Period of use: 3 years

Strengths:

Sharpness on f1.4 corner to corner, bokeh,min. focus distance, excellent color and contrast rendition,hight material body quality (metal,glass and good plastic combination), weathershealed. Made in Japan made for lifetime!


Weaknesses:

Little bit big and heavy, some situation slow auto focus


Comments:

I think one of the best Fujinon lens ever made for APS-C sensor for street-,landscape-,evening- and indoor photgraphy for the price. Made in Japan made for lifetime, I never sale this lens in my life....




buslig22 05.01.2025 14:58:30
User review for lens: Samyang 12 mm f/ 2.0 NCS CS

Period of use: 2 years

Strengths:

Very good price,lightweight and small,good color an contrast rendition,f2,0 apperture excellent for astrophotography! Good quality of body material.


Weaknesses:

Lens flare and vignetting, no auto focus,big lens hood.


Comments:

Great lens for the price, good material quality.




Kevin Pinkerton 30.10.2024 18:24:33
User review for lens: Tele Vivitar 85 mm f/ 1.8 Tele

Period of use: 4 years

Strengths:

The lens with the preset is amazing and put it on a helicoid and you can get some wonderful bokeh (wide open). The lens is very sharp.


Weaknesses:

The T mount I have keeps loosening up, but I will solve that soon. RAF Camera to the rescue again.


Comments:

A solid, well made lens.




NerveNet 23.10.2024 05:51:55
User review for lens: Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 90 mm f/ 3.5 SL II Close Focus

Period of use: 1 year

Strengths:

Sharp, APOchromatic and small. Long manual focus throw. Good build quality.


Weaknesses:

A bit pricey in the second market, you can still get them cheaper brand new. LoL

Slow f/3.5 max aperture.


Comments:

This lens was a discovery for me. Of course a f/3.5 medium telephoto lens seems not to be the most exciting lens in the world, but judge the results hot the specs.

This little gem is very sharp, close the aperture a bit and it is even sharper.

Not a cheap manual focus lens, but you will not find anything smaller and better build for this price. Well, may be the Tamron SP 90mm Adaptall-2 can compete here.

Manual focus is a pleasure, like cutting butter. As the lens has a chip on it, you can trust the focus confirmation on your Canon DSLR most of the time.

Remember that it is a APO lens.

And it is very small for an 90mm lens. Front thread is 52mm diameter like the other Voigtländer SL lenses (20mm, 28mm, 40mm), most Nikkors Ai and Ai-s and the firs batch of EF lenses (28mm, 35mm and 50mm primes).




NerveNet 23.10.2024 05:34:45
User review for lens: Nikon AF Nikkor 28 mm f/ 2.8 (I)

Period of use: 14 months

Strengths:

Autofocus, lightweight, small, cheap.


Weaknesses:

Bad sharpness, feels cheap in the hand.


Comments:

Optically it is far inferior to my Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 Ai-S in any regard except autofocus. Optically It is more close to my Tamron 28mm f/2.5 Adaptall-2, but the Tammy is sharper at f/8.

If you need the borders to be sharp, simply forget this lens or begín to close at f/11...

On the other hand, you will not find a cheaper f-mount 28mm lens that can do autofocus.




NerveNet 23.10.2024 05:23:40
User review for lens: 7artisans 18mm f/6.3 UFO

Period of use: 16 months

Strengths:

Cheap, lightweight and fully pocketable (very small). Good center sharpness.


Weaknesses:

Strong vignetting and magenta cast.

No way to adjust focus nor aperture.

No lens cap, you can use instead a 56mm diameter binocular lens cap.

No lens hood, beware the sun.


Comments:

IMHO it is a toy lens, a funny one in anycase. Simply point and shoot... This lens renders subjects sharp when they are 3 meters away.

Mine is always on my Canon EOS M when the 22m is not in use.

Sharpness is good in center, a bit worse in the corners. Chromatic aberration is well controlled. But it has very strong vignetting, and a booring magenta cast. It has no bokeh to show.

If you shoot in black and white you will get nice vintage pictures without much post-processing, colour pictures need more work.

If you have concerns about damaging the front element of this lens as there is no lens cap, you can use cheap 56mm diameter binocular lens cap instead.

I also tried the second version of this lens which is less sharper in my opinion but provides manual focus function.




Kevin Pinkerton 22.10.2023 01:58:55
User review for lens: Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 80 mm f/ 2.8 T

Period of use: 5 years

Strengths:

This lens is the sharpest lens I own. I know not everyone agrees with that. I use this lens for light table photography to import my negatives into raw format. And is hands down the sharpest, edge to edge of every lens I could use for that purpose. And as far as normal photography, this lens shines.Mine has 12 blades.


Weaknesses:

None.


Comments:

This is a keeper lens.




JMiguel 20.06.2023 06:44:56
User review for lens: Mamiya-Sekor C 45 mm f/ 2.8 N

Period of use: 5 years

Strengths:

This is to my opinion the sharpes lens that mamiya has ever made, I use it  in my Mamiya 645AFn with a Phase one 50mp digital back. I have enlarged prints to 96 inches (244 cm) wide and the quality is excellent.


Weaknesses:

None


Comments:

Small and light, very unusual for medium format lenses.




JMiguel 20.06.2023 06:32:01
User review for lens: Canon EF 24-70 mm  f/ 2.8 L USM

Period of use: 20 years

Strengths:

This lens have a high IQ, it is very sharp and I used it at weddings for many years with excellent results.


Weaknesses:

It is big and heavy!


Comments:

It is build like a tank!




JMiguel 20.06.2023 06:14:05
User review for lens: Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 20 mm f/ 4

Period of use: 5 years

Strengths:

This is a very sharp lens and the images are saturated with beautiful colors. Small and lightweight. I use it for Landscape photography on my Sony a7Rii.


Weaknesses:

It is dificult to focus because the focus ring is big and in my copy not very smoth. I don't think is a good walk around lens but excellent for landscape photography.


Comments:

I got my at a very low price, it was mounted in an Exakta camera. The camera was damage, but I opened the lens and fixed,  (it was missing the rubber that goes on top of the focusing ring, I bought a generic one and was able to use it with good results) I manage to salvage the lens and I have used it with excellent results.




JMiguel 14.06.2023 23:32:09
User review for lens: Canon EF 70-200 mm f/ 2.8 L IS USM

Period of use: 20 years

Strengths:

I use to be a portrait photographer for 40 years and still today I do some portraits. This is the lens I use for outdoor portraits, I love the skin tones and the bokeh of this lens.


Weaknesses:

Some times it may have a little chromatic aberration, but it can be fix in LR.


Comments:

I have sold most of my Canon EF lenses, but I don't think I can depart from these one.




JMiguel 14.06.2023 23:04:39
User review for lens: Sigma AF 15 mm f/ 2.8 EX Fisheye

Period of use: 20 years

Strengths:

This is an exellent lens if you like the fisheye effect. 


Weaknesses:

none


Comments:

I have the Canon EF version and in more tham 20 years it has never been for repair.




JMiguel 10.06.2023 19:29:20
User review for lens: RE Auto-Topcor 100 mm f/ 2.8

Period of use: 5 years

Strengths:

This is one of the sharpest lens I own. It is also build like a tank.

PERIOD OF USE IS 5 YEARS, (For some reason i pick 5 years and it shows 5 months).


Weaknesses:

None


Comments:

I will never leave home without it, it is always in my bag.




JMiguel 04.06.2023 06:05:02
User review for lens: Canon FD 28 mm f/ 2.8

Period of use: 4 years

Strengths:

This lens has good contrast, small and light, and overall decent IQ, I compare it and it is lighter and a little sharper than my manual focusing Nikkor 28mm 2.8. Especially on the edges.


Weaknesses:

Has Plastic in it, but it makes it lighter. Actually it may be and avantage.


Comments:

Good quality at low price (about $60). If you want a better performer you can buy an Art lens 28mm for about $600




JMiguel 04.06.2023 05:46:15
User review for lens: RE Auto-Topcor 58 mm f/ 1.8

Period of use: 4 years

Strengths:

This is a beautiful lens and it is a great performer, it is very sharp and the colors are amazing.


Weaknesses:

None


Comments:

I also have the 58mm 1.4 that has a nice Boke but I like the colors of the 1.8 better. For Landscape and Nature photography the 1.8 is better. I do mainly Landscape.




JMiguel 04.06.2023 05:20:36
User review for lens: A. Schacht Ulm Edixa-Travegon 35 mm f/ 3.5

Period of use: 3 years

Strengths:

This Lens is amazing, It is so sharp and it has some magic in it that makes an average picture look like art. I never use it at f3.5 becouse I do landscaping and I need the deep of field, but at f8 or f11 it will beat all my new canon lenses. I have also compared it to my Topcon 35mm 2.8 and it performs a lot better. This is the only wide angle lens I have that is sharp in the corners. 


Weaknesses:

To me it has no weakness, but if you photograph people or moving objects it may be slow.


Comments:

My copy is the Exakta mount and I use it with an adapter on my Sony a7Rii. If you can find one, buy it you will never regret it. I bought my in Europe and had to wait 3 weeks for it.




JMiguel 22.05.2023 03:22:47
User review for lens: Meyer-Optik Gorlitz Telemegor 180 mm f/ 5.5 (1)

Period of use: 5 years

Strengths:
This is a great lens, I use it for landscape photography and it give me like a soft painting effect and at the same time it has a lot of detail with a good IQ. I am in love with this lens. It is also very light and compact. 

Weaknesses:

For some people the weaknes could be that is a f5.5, but for me it doesn't matter because I always use f8 or f11.


Comments:

I never go out without having this lens in my back pack. I have the 42mm mount version. I use it on my Sony a7Rii.



Milan Cvijanovic 01.02.2023 19:38:18
User review for lens: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50 mm f/1.8

Period of use: 2 years

Strengths:
  • Sharp
  • pleasing colour rendering
  • good flare control
  • bokeh

Weaknesses:

  • Singapore made lenses are prone to mechanical defects
  • bokeh on photos taken from close distance on cloudy day with no light points may be ugly.

Comments:

Optically, it is the same lens as Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm f1.8 and Rollei Planar 50mm f1.8 in QBM mount. That means very nice rendering, sharpness, centre sharpness even wide open. Bokeh is a very subjective affair. I personally like planar bokeh, but a lot of reviewers are not pleased with it. To get good results, one needs to know the lens and use it according to its strengths. That means that in some situations Ultron (planar) will create ugly background, but it is easy to avoid it.




Leo Koikov 11.11.2022 17:46:54
User review for lens: Nikon Nikkor-Q 135 mm f/ 2.8 non-Ai

Period of use: 2 years

Strengths:

Optical quality!!!

Bokeh!!!! The best of 2 dozens of 135s that I've tried on Sony A7ii/iii

Build


Weaknesses:

Heavy and bulky


Comments:

I've tried many highly praised manual Nikkors on FF Sony A7ii/iii, didn't like the images they produced and swore to stay away from NIkon. That is until I found a clean copy of this lens at local shop with 2 weeks return policy. Well, this one stayed in my stable. Color rendering/transitions and BOKEH!!!

https://www.flickr.com/photos/127536411@N03/50858619447/in/dateposted-public/





Paging: [ 1 ] 2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22