remember me Forgot your password?
Sign in    Registration                 We’re creating the largest and most complete database of photographic lenses in the world! Join us!
All About Photographic Lenses.
Specifications, comparison, reviews,
MTF-charts for lenses by Canon,
Nikon, Sony, Pentax, Olympus,
Sigma, Tamron, Carl Zeiss, etc.


Industar-61 L/Z (MC) 50 mm f/ 2.8 Lens

Pictures

Industar-61 L/Z (MC) 50 mm f/ 2.8 lens

Industar-61 L/Z (MC) 50 mm f/ 2.8 lens

Industar-61 L/Z (MC) 50 mm f/ 2.8 lens

Industar-61 L/Z (MC) 50 mm f/ 2.8 lens

Optical design

Industar-61 L/Z (MC) 50 mm f/ 2.8 optical design

Format: 35mm SLR

Type: Prime lens

Focusing: Manual Focus (MF)

Lens mounts: M42

Optical design: 4 elements in 3 groups

User reviews (8)

Photos (67)

Tests (2)

Owners (64)

Views (22571)

Average price: $83

Specifications:

Focal lengthMax. apertureMin. apertureBladesMin. Focus (m.)Filter Ø (mm.)Weight (gr/oz)Length (mm/in)
50mmf/2.8f/1660.349225/7,959/2,3

Additional information:

The Industar-61 L/Z 50 mm f/ 2.8 (Russian: "Индустар-61 Л/З 50/2.8") is a standard lens for SLR cameras with m39 and m42 screw mounts, based  on the Tessar optical scheme. It came in two variants: with and without multi-coating (MC)

The optical scheme was calculated by the Soviet optician Academician  Slyusarev G. and Sokolova V.

The aperture is made up of 6 curved blades (blackening is good) that create a somewhat rounded pentagon that made it possible to get an interesting characteristic bokeh.

The lens generates a sharp image with  good contrast, but with slight aberrations.

The lens has a good macrography potential. It enables to take 1:1.25 macro scale pictures or 1:1 with a reversed lens.

It came in several versions with different designations.

The following characteristics are given for the most mass and popular version - the Industar-61 L/Z 2.8/50 (Индустар-61Л/З 2.8/50).

Resolution according to the technical specifications (center/edge) for the L/Z version: 42/30 lines/mm

 

Other versions:

The Industar - 61 M (Индустар-61М)

  • System: m42
  • Minimum focusing distance: 0.5 m.
  • Filter diameter: 40 mm
  • Resolution according the technical specifications (center/edge): 38/25 lines/mm.
  • Coefficient of transparency: 0.75
  • Length: 55 mm
  • Weight: 140 gm

The Industar-61-Z (Индустар-61-З)

  • System: m39
  • Minimum focusing distance: 0.42 m
  • Filter diameter: 52 mm
  • Resolution according to the technical specifications (center/edge): 45/28 lines/mm
  • Coefficient of transparency: 0.85
  • Length: 58 mm
  • Weight: 260 gm

The Industar-61L, Industar-61 L/D

These versions for rangefinder cameras will be added to the database and described in a separate article.


Links to online resources:
PDF Files:
Reviews, tests, comparisons on AllPhotoLenses.com:
Posted by: Sergei Borodin   Date of publication: 30.11.2010



Photos taken with this lens Industar-61 L/Z (MC) 50 mm f/ 2.8:


coin
Autor: Ultrafiolet
5 0 2208

Wrist Watch
Autor: Ultrafiolet
5 0 2485

Printed circuit board (macro)
Autor: KiRx
5 0 2549

Rainy day
Autor: Web walker
5 0 1679

Mechanical quality4.1723
Optical quality4.5223
Usability4.0123
Pricing / Value4.6022
Bokeh4.4023
Overall lens rating
4.34

Embed to Blog (HTML) Embed to Forum (BBcode)


Owner reviews: Industar-61 L/Z (MC) 50 mm f/ 2.8

rahmannnn 12.08.2014 22:14:49
Period of use: 1 year

Strengths:

special bokeh

close focusing

sharp


Weaknesses:

a dim normal lens

soft wide open


Comments:

good lens




Bakin 1.1.2000 00:00:01
Period of use: 18 year

Strengths:

Very sharp picture.

Very good for close-up in different use cases (Changeling, rings, double).

Works well in backllight, if MC version of lens

Built-in lens hood (recessed front lens)

Weaknesses:

The sharp bokeh


Comments:

Very good lens, but for a particular use. Say portraits, I would not shoot them. But the macro, landscape, art, etc, - an excellent choice!

About the starry aperture - sometimes produces interesting effects, but in general - for an amateur.

In the film, as it is better perceived outcomes, with a digital camera did not like ...