remember me Forgot your password?
Sign in    Registration                 We’re creating the largest and most complete database of photographic lenses in the world! Join us!
All About Photographic Lenses.
Specifications, comparison, reviews,
MTF-charts for lenses by Canon,
Nikon, Sony, Pentax, Olympus,
Sigma, Tamron, Carl Zeiss, etc.


Lens User Reviews (322)

Here you can view lens reviews written by their owners. To add your own review please login and select your lens in the lens database.

Lens mount

Brand

Format

Prime/zoom

Focusing

Focal length
from to
Max. aperture
from to
Price ($)
from to

advanced search
Ultra-Sonic Motor
Macro lens
Fisheye lens
Mirror lens
Shift lens
Tilt lens
Soft lens
Optical stabilisation
Defocus control
Paging: [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] ... [ 15 ] [ 16 ] [ 17 ]

Ferenc Boloni 23.02.2018 22:20:20
User review for lens: Tamron 85-210 mm f/ 4.5 Adaptall model CZ-210M

Period of use: 1 day

Strengths:

Cheap but great build with great optical quality and macro function too .


Weaknesses:

no weakness


Comments:

My first Adaptall zoom lens and is great .




Ferenc Boloni 23.02.2018 04:16:16
User review for lens: Meyer-Optik Görlitz Lydith 30 mm f/ 3.5

Period of use: 2 years

Strengths:

I use it for close up shots wide open at f/3.5 really nice details colors and bokeh .


Weaknesses:

Mine version is strange the way change the aperture :)) but actually i don't need for change at f/3.5 is nice sharp :)


Comments:

Usually you can find cheap this lens but they are great :)




NerveNet 20.02.2018 01:09:38
User review for lens: Canon EF 70-210 mm f/ 4

Period of use: 4 years

Strengths:

Cheap, constant f/4 aperture accross the 70-210mm focal length range, focus limiter.


Weaknesses:

Slow focus motor, some vignetting, chromatic aberration not well controlled and some softness at f/4.

Front element rotates while focusing.

Not compatible with Canon Teleconverters.

All made of plastic, only the mount is made of metal.


Comments:

To be honest, I like this push-pull design, much faster than rotating the focal-length ring on other lenses.

I also like the constant f/4 aperture accross the focal range, this is important for me when shooting indoors with an external flash (I like to use flash in manual mode). Or when shooting outdoors in Av mode and controlling the shutter speed.

To get sharp results I need to close one full stop (f/5.6), at f/4 some softness is present but pictures are usable.

This lens, IMHO, is better than the cheap Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 USM III, from a optical point of view.

This lens suffers from chromatic aberrations in high constrast areas, closing the aperture here doesn't helps.

The worst thing is the slow focus motor, not usable in fast outdoor sports like soccer if you get the player running to you. It also slows down the max FPS of my 50D, shotting slower than 6fps.

You cannot use Canon's teleconverters with this lens, they will not fit.

You can get nice portraits with blurred backgrounds.




NerveNet 20.02.2018 00:42:27
User review for lens: Voigtlander 20 mm f/ 3.5 Color Skopar SL II

Period of use: 16 months

Strengths:

Compact all metal body, smooth focus ring, electronic aperture control. Small filter size (52mm).


Weaknesses:

Strong corner vignetting, weak corner sharpness. Chromatic aberration present in high contrast areas. Some barrel distortion.


Comments:

I also own the old Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM (I used two copies of this lens). The Canon is sharper in the center than the Voigtlander, corner sharpness is similar on booth, and vignetting is better controlled in the Voigtlander. Booth suffers from chromatic aberrations in high contrast areas, stopping down helps a bit but doesn't solves the issue.

Stopped down IMHO the Canon has a slight advantage over the Voigtlander across the frame in overall sharpness.

Manual focusing is not an issue with the Voigtlander, a 20mm focal length has a wide depth of field, nothing to worry about, no need to use a high precission focus screen.

 

But when it comes to portability, the Voigtlander wins. If you want to carry severall primes this small 20mm pancake lens is very nice to have.

I currently have loaded in my bag with a Voigtlander 20mm, Canon EF 40mm, Canon EF 135mm (all 52mm filtersize diameter




Ferenc Boloni 10.02.2018 09:53:31
User review for lens: Kiron MC 28 mm f/ 2

Period of use: 1 year

Strengths:

Close up shots sharp f/2.0 nice bokeh , quite underrated this lens but is not so bad as the ratings shows . If you are looking a lens for close shots with crazy bokeh or background blur can be one choice .


Weaknesses:

Quite expensive


Comments:

Depends for what you wanna use this lens fow video is ok and close up shots or macro with crazy bokeh or bacground blur .




Ferenc Boloni 10.02.2018 08:56:14
User review for lens: Konica Hexanon AR 50 mm f/ 1.7

Period of use: 1 year

Strengths:

On Sony full frame or apsc one of sharpest manual  lens at f/1.7 ever use . This lens are amazing . And the bokeh  is one of the best i ever seen . And for the price of 12 $ this lens the same will be one of the lens what i will never sale .


Weaknesses:

No weakness


Comments:

With 2x or 3x teleconverter the same crazy sharp  .

Sometimes for get better results details sharpnes i found even on full frame or apsc the 24 megapixel reduced at half brings the magic . And the same sometimes what camera sensors are detect is sharp not always is right if you will magnify the image will be visible you have to adjust the real sharpnes a little bit :)




Giuseppe 07.02.2018 02:38:21
User review for lens: Vivitar 70-150 mm f/ 3.8 Close Focusing Zoom Lens (2 touch version)

Period of use: 3 months

Strengths:

smal,sharp,built quality


Weaknesses:

CYs wide open.


Comments:

smalest zoom lense i ever used




changing 02.02.2018 18:59:01
User review for lens: Minolta MC Rokkor-PF 55 mm f/ 1.7

Period of use: 6 months

Strengths:

Smooth bokeh, excellent Minolta colors, built like a tank.  Has decent coma performance for a vintage standard lens.


Weaknesses:

Lacks critical sharpness, noticable on high density sensors like 16mpix+ APS-C.  Flare and ghosting resistance is bad.


Comments:

A great cheap lens for film or 24mpix full frame cameras.




Ferenc Boloni 26.01.2018 11:07:12
User review for lens: Cosina AF MC 75-200 mm f /4.5 Macro

Period of use: 1 year

Strengths:

Wide open is sharp lens , internal focus  , cheap for day lights photography not bad .


Weaknesses:

The start aperture f4.5 , the focusing motor is noisy and slow , personal i dont use it .


Comments:

if you love manual focus lens and you wanna be sure you have one sharp lens for about 10$ it can be one option .




Leo Koikov 23.01.2018 02:48:12
User review for lens: Pentax SMC K 135 mm f/ 2.5

Period of use: 1 month

Strengths:

Sharpness wide open

Color and contrast


Weaknesses:

500g (but balances pretty well)

No Manual-Auto switch on my copy, so the pin does not allow changing aperture on digital body w/o modifications: https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/10-pentax-slr-lens-discussion/308154-asahi-smc-takumar-135mm-2-5-m42.html   


Comments:

I've got an earlier SMC PENTAX 1:2.5/135 version (1975-1977) as opposed to smc PENTAX 1:2.5/135 (1977-1985). Both versions are considered the sharpest wide open 135mm lense ever made with excellent color reproduction. It surpasses Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:2.5 135mm (M42). 

135mm Lens War: http://oomz.net/135/




Ferenc Boloni 19.01.2018 04:57:48
User review for lens: Sigma 400 mm f/ 5.6 APO

Period of use: 1 year

Strengths:

Small cheap fast focus but don't wait miracle from it . dyxum.com have a right rating about  the sharpness of this lens is weak .


Weaknesses:

Because is not sharp  from f/5.6 i think is better look from other lens :)


Comments:

Maybe some other versions of this lens  are good but mine is good for decoration in my room :)




Ferenc Boloni 16.01.2018 14:26:51
User review for lens: Zeiss Batis Sonnar T* FE 85 mm f/ 1.8

Period of use: 1 year

Strengths:

Amazing lens sharp wide open nice bokeh and on lens is not writed but have image stabilization this is the reason why i buy it instead the cheaper the same optic quality Sony lens .


Weaknesses:

In low lights conditions sometimes ghosting ...hard focusing .


Comments:

If some think in professional  way of portrait or fashion photography is a great choice ...at this time they are some new other better lenses even at f/1.4 but not image stabilized .




Ferenc Boloni 05.01.2018 22:31:43
User review for lens: Jupiter-9 85 mm  f/ 2.0

Period of use: 5 days

Strengths:

Great build lens and cheap , mine is start be acceptable sharp at f/4.0 for this reason  i almost not use it .


Weaknesses:

Mine version start be usable a f/4.0 for this reason i almost not use it .


Comments:

Before buy check vide open sharpness ...some versions are satrt to be usable just at f/4.0 ...




Bernard 05.01.2018 14:42:40
User review for lens: Kiron MC 28 mm f/ 2

Period of use: 4 years

Strengths:

Sharpness, good rending colors


Weaknesses:

Very good


Comments:

I have pentax K/A copy. With auto aperture. I love this lens!




inky adrian 11.12.2017 00:55:35
User review for lens: Minolta AF 70-210 mm f/ 4

Period of use: 1

Strengths:

N/A


Weaknesses:

N/A


Comments:

My lens is not shown: Minolta MD Zoom 70-210mm f:4




tightcamera 08.12.2017 18:59:15
User review for lens: Canon EF-M 18-55 mm f/ 3.5-5.6 IS STM

Period of use: 3 months

Strengths:

This lens is a fairly basic "kit" lens designed for the EOS M line of mirrorless cameras. It is not EF or EF-S mount and will not fit on any Canon DSLR. It is equivalent to the EF-S mount 18-55mm IS STM in many respects, but if you put the two side by side, the EF-M incarnation feels a lot more substantial (despite being physically smaller). Image quality is also superior in the EF-M version. Along with something like an EOS M or EOS M3, this lens is a great low-cost option for a high-quality travel photography setup.

Build quality seems quite nice, and the lens feels good in hand. It feels sturdy, seems to have exterior sheathing of metal or metal composite, and the zoom and focus rings are very smooth turning. The STM focusing technology in this lens allows for continuous AF operation (focus tracking, etc),


Weaknesses:

Image quality is good, but not great. I noticed green (predominant) and purple (less pronounced) fringing in many, if not most, photos. This is easily removed in post-processing with a RAW workflow, but it would be nicer if that weren't necessary. Sharpness is very good in the center, and like most lenses, falls off at the edges.

Vignetting is noticeable at all focal lengths at wider apertures (< f/5.6) but is nearly non-existent at f/8 and beyond. Or you can use the lens correction presets in Photoshop or Lightroom to correct in one easy step.


Comments:

This is part of a longer review I wrote here: http://tightcamera.com/canon-18-55mm/




Churst 07.12.2017 19:05:30
User review for lens: Tamron SP AF 17-50 mm f/ 2.8 Di II VC XR LD Aspherical (IF)

Period of use: 5 years

Strengths:

- Great set of focal lengths for APS-C cameras, makes  a very suitable single lens solution for lightweight travel.

- Wide Aperture across the zoom length.


Weaknesses:

- Not always tack sharp wide open, needs to be stopped down to about f/4 to get the most sharpness.


Comments:

Overall this lens is really very good for the money. 




purelightglow 21.11.2017 21:56:41
User review for lens: Canon EF 100 mm f/ 2 USM

Period of use: 1 year

Strengths:

small with quality optical preformance and has a subtle and smooth bokeh compared to other lenses


Weaknesses:

older coating on my version if there are newer lens coatings on any of these. handles sun flare excellently


Comments:

older coating on my version is actually prefered often. I paid 150$ cdn in 2016. I use a paper coffee cup collar for a hood which is great as they're free and collapsable in the gear bag




versus 06.11.2017 13:24:21
User review for lens: Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24 mm f/ 2.8 G ED

Period of use: 5 years

Strengths:

- super wide angle

- very low distorsion and vignetting

- fast and sharp

(compared to the 16-35/f4 vr)


Weaknesses:

- it's a problem to use of filters, for example for landscape

- heavy

- no vr

- not very stabile (it fell on a wooden floor from 40cm height and was damaged)


Comments:

i love it and it's one of the most used lenses, especially for landscape and architectur




purelightglow 20.10.2017 21:29:06
User review for lens: Carl Zeiss Distagon 35 mm f/ 2.8

Period of use: 1 year

Strengths:

colour, contrast, resolution, flare handling


Weaknesses:

vignetting, mild colour fringing is good compared to many other new and old lenses but is more visable due to digital sensor capture vs film.


Comments:

Rollei/Carl Zeiss QBM 35/2.8 on dslr is excellent and will take the same picture as the new canon 40mm 2.8. the canon will actually produce a slightly sharper image if stared at magnified. And the Zeiss slightly darker shadows. focus control is one of the reasons I would choose this lens and not the canon





Paging: [ 1 ] 2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17