remember me Forgot your password?
Sign in    Registration                 We’re creating the largest and most complete database of photographic lenses in the world! Join us!
All About Photographic Lenses.
Specifications, comparison, reviews,
MTF-charts for lenses by Canon,
Nikon, Sony, Pentax, Olympus,
Sigma, Tamron, Carl Zeiss, etc.

Industar-61 L/D 55 mm f/ 2.8 Lens


Industar-61 L/D 55 mm f/ 2.8 lens

Industar-61 L/D 55 mm f/ 2.8 lens

Industar-61 L/D 55 mm f/ 2.8 lens

Industar-61 L/D 55 mm f/ 2.8 lens

Optical design

Industar-61 L/D 55 mm f/ 2.8 optical design

Format: 35mm rangefinder

Type: Prime lens

Focusing: Manual Focus (MF)

Lens mounts: M39 Leica screw-mount (LSM)

First year of production: 1971

Optical design: 4 elements in 3 groups (Tessar)

User reviews (2)

Photos (11)

Tests (0)

Owners (39)

Views (9317)

Average price: $30


Focal lengthMax. apertureMin. apertureBladesMin. Focus (m.)Filter Ø (mm.)Weight (gr/oz)Length (mm/in)

Additional information:
  • F=52,42 mm
  • Ø max 55 mm

The Industar-61 L/D 55mm f/2.8 (Russian: "Индустар-61 Л/Д 50/2.8") is a kit lens for FED rangefinder cameras. The  application of lanthanum glass made it possible to get rather high resolution while preserving a simple optical scheme and a 2.8 lens speed (44/30 lines/mm center/edges).

Besides the barrel, a blackened aperture with the greater number of blades (six vs. five) sets Industar-61 L/D apart from other SLR versions.

PDF Files:
Posted by: nukemall   Date of publication: 05.03.2011

Photos taken with this lens Industar-61 L/D 55 mm f/ 2.8:

Girl in red
Autor: nukemall
5 0 1823

Autor: Harkovsky
5 0 1744

Autor: Harkovsky
4.5 0 1832

Autor: Fabio Bartoccioni
4 0 676

Mechanical quality4.1811
Optical quality4.0011
Pricing / Value4.4511
Overall lens rating

Embed to Blog (HTML) Embed to Forum (BBcode)

Owner reviews: Industar-61 L/D 55 mm f/ 2.8

Metasynthese 23.12.2013 06:07:09
Period of use: 6 months


-Price considering RF coupling




-strong quality spreading (I had several of them, also in mint, all visibly different)

-strong OOF fringing

-ice cold colors

-blueish CAs sometimes also when stopped down

-rather low contrast

-bad flare control

-optimum performance F8-F11 (depending on quality spreading)

-under average sharpness, also stopped down to F8-F11

-low acutance

-bokeh is not my taste

-Alu build, very soft


I don't get why this lens has such a good reputation. It's imho one of the worst 50mm lenses on the market.

I had several other USSR and GDR Tessar(-like) lenses and this was the worst of them. Industar 50-2 and Industar-22 are better for my taste, aswell as CZJ 50/2.8.

Many cheaper 50mm are better. Minolta MD 50/2 for example.