Specifications, comparison, reviews,
MTF-charts for lenses by Canon,
Nikon, Sony, Pentax, Olympus,
Sigma, Tamron, Carl Zeiss, etc.
Do you like a guitar? We have the best covers of classic and popular music for a guitar.
Sheet music and tabs. Look it...
Girl in red
5 0 2864
5 0 2502
4.25 0 2850
4 0 1322
Owner reviews: Industar-61 L/D 55 mm f/ 2.8
-Price considering RF coupling
-strong quality spreading (I had several of them, also in mint, all visibly different)
-strong OOF fringing
-ice cold colors
-blueish CAs sometimes also when stopped down
-rather low contrast
-bad flare control
-optimum performance F8-F11 (depending on quality spreading)
-under average sharpness, also stopped down to F8-F11
-bokeh is not my taste
-Alu build, very soft
I don't get why this lens has such a good reputation. It's imho one of the worst 50mm lenses on the market.
I had several other USSR and GDR Tessar(-like) lenses and this was the worst of them. Industar 50-2 and Industar-22 are better for my taste, aswell as CZJ 50/2.8.
Many cheaper 50mm are better. Minolta MD 50/2 for example.